DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
SIN
Docket No: 9721-14
17 October 2014
Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy
(a} 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1} DD Form 149 with attachments
(2} Case summary
(3) Subject's naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a _
former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this
Board requesting a changes to the reason for her discharge,
separation authority “MILPERSMSN 3620200”, “LGH” separation code,
and RE-4 (not recommended for reentry) reentry code.
2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Ms. Bianchi, and
Mr. Vogt, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and ,
injustice on 7 October 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the limited corrective action-indicated below
should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary
material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures,
naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations, and
policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as
follows: . ;
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. Although enclosure (1) was not filed in a timely manner,
it is in the interest of justice to waive the statute of
limitations and review the application on its merits.
¢. On 21 January 1988, Petitioner réenlisted in the Navy
after six years of honorable service. She served without
incident until 20 January 1994, when she was honorably discharged
SIN
Docket No: 9721-14
at the completion of her obligated service. At that time, her
narrative reason for discharge was due to nonretention and she
assigned an RE-4 reentry code.
d. Petitioner was authorized “full” separation pay vice “one
half” separation pay when discharged on 20 January 1994.
Additionally, she should have been assigned a “JBK” (completion
of required service) separation code vice the “LGH”
{(nonretention) separation code.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants partial
favorable action. In this regard, the Board concludes that
Petitioner should have been assigned and a “JBK” vice “LGH"
separation code on 20 January 1994. Additionally, she was
properly discharged and assigned the appropriate reentry code due
to nonretention vice her assertion of a personality disorder.
RECOMMENDATION;
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that
on 20 January 1994, she was assigned an “JBK” separation code
_ vice the “LGH” separation code actually assinged on that date.
b. That no further relief be granted.
ec. That a copy of this report of proceedings be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.
dad. That upon request, the Department of Veterans Affairs be
informed that Petitioner's application was received on 12 March
2013.
4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board! Ss proceedings in the above entitled
Matter.
T.d. “REED
Recorder
SUN
Docket No: 9721-14
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
ROBERT J. O’NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2436-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former officer of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board _ requesting, in effect, that her characterization of service - “Under other than honorable (OTH) conditions", narrative reason for separation, “homosexual conduct”, Separation Program Designator (SPD) “HRB”, and “RE-4” {not recommended for retention) reentry code, be changed per reference (b). It provides service Discharge Review Boards with the authority to grant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8651 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the RE-4 (non-recommendation for retention) for reentry code issued on 9 August 2013 be upgraded. The Board, consisting of Mr. Lippolis, Mr. Rothlein, and Ms. Montgomery, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 June 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12657-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of full separation pay when she was @ischarged on 4 September 2010. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 March 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9501 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the MDF (pregnancy or childbirth} separation code and RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code issued on 2 May 1994, be upgraded. The Board, consisting of Mr. 4salman, Mr. Rothlein, and Ms. Henkel, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 23 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3703-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7901S. The Board concludes that based upon her record of service, relatively minor disciplinary infractions, and current Department of the Navy policy as established in reference (b), that relief in the form of her narrative reason for separation be changed to “Secretarial Authority”, SPD code changed to “JFF”, and reentry code be changed to “RE-1J". 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00813-07
He was assigned a reentry code of RE-4 because his commanding officer had withdrawn the recommendation for his advancement and retention on 20 July 2006. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show, as an exception to policy, that he was assigned a reentry code of RE-6 on 20 July 2006, vice the code of RE-~4 he actually received on that date. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6613 14
‘rom: Chairman, 7 CrArRe ae especi the ex (a) Title 1¢ (aj ok Form Sear ce cognizance a action. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5. COURTHOUSE ROAD.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 10307-05
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100TRG Docket No: 10307-05 30 March 2007 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF @ Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed an application with this Board requesting reinstatement in the Navy or a change in his reenlistment code. That...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 04334-12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in her RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code issued on 12 January 1998. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Boyd, Storz and Ms. Wilcher, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 19 March 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05926-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference fa), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that her RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code and reason for her discharge (erroneous entry) be changed. Subsequently, she was notified of proposed action for an administrative separation by reason of erroneous enlistment as evidenced by a mental condition that existed prior to entry into the naval service. She submitted a...